Letter: In Brief

Saturday 27 February 1999 00:02 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The BMA warns that any surgeon amputating a woman's normal breasts for non-therapeutic reasons could be in breach of his ethical duty - even with the woman's consent ("Cancer fear drives woman to have breasts removed", 23 February).

But the BMA does not oppose (and refuses to comment on the ethics of) the non-therapeutic amputation of a boy's normal foreskin - even without the child's consent.

ROGER SPENCE

Dorchester, Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: In Brief

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering