Letter: Guilty of forgery

Monday 05 July 1993 23:02 BST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your summary (leading article, 3 July) of the Nadir/Mates/SFO tangle leaves out one prime ingredient. A public body has been guilty of forgery, at least once and perhaps as a commoner practice. The Attorney General, no less, has called this silly but not dishonourable. If he really believes that, he should not hold the office he does hold. Forgery is a crime.

Yours sincerely,

PETER CALVOCORESSI

Bath

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: Guilty of forgery

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering