Letter: If the CAP doesn't fit, it stretches

Tuesday 15 December 1992 00:02 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: After having seen the text of the Edinburgh agreement, your readers may be interested to know that not only did the budget agreement allow an increase next year of pounds 1.2bn for the Common Agricultural Policy, it also provided that if CAP expenditure exceeds its guidelines, 'appropriate steps to increase the EAGGF Guarantee (that is, CAP) will be taken by the Council'.

In other words, John Major seems to be admitting that agricultural expenditure is far from under control.

Yours faithfully,

TERRY WYNN

MEP for Merseyside East (Lab)

St Helens, Merseyside

14 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: If the CAP doesn't fit, it stretches

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering