Letter: Queer logic

Sunday 05 June 1994 23:02 BST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Michael De-la-Noy (letter, 3 June) asks whether we find Peter Tatchell's use of the word 'queers' offensive. I don't, because I know from the context of his article, and his public profile, that he is a sincere campaigner for homosexual equality.

The point is of more than passing interest, for it goes to the heart of the debate about 'politically correct' language. Those who insist on an approved list of acceptable words miss the point that it is the intent and attitude of the speaker which are important. In the use of the word 'queers', I would indeed find it offensive if used by someone to belittle or stereotype homosexuals - but by Peter Tatchell? I think not.

Yours faithfully,

ROGER GRAHAM-LEIGH

Sprowston, Norfolk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: Queer logic

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering