Letter: Refusing transfusion

Monday 27 July 1992 23:02 BST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The article 'Critically ill woman seeks right to die' (23 July) is factually incorrect, misleading and offensive to Jehovah's Witnesses, who are not 'against the use of artificial means to preserve life'. Rather, they gladly accept all medical treatment necessary, except the transfusion of blood or blood components.

By refusing blood transfusion, Jehovah's Witnesses do not try to exercise 'a right to die'. They ask for medical treatment without the use of blood. As a Jehovah's Witness, I will fight to stay alive and will use the best medical technology available, but not blood. I hope I find a co-operative doctor.

Yours sincerely,

PATRICK BOYCE

Sandbach, Cheshire

23 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: Refusing transfusion

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering