Letter: Some unattractive aspects of accelerated courses

Ms Maria Cowley
Sunday 27 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Sir: I wish to disagree with the comment in your report, 'Universities consider switch to four terms' (24 September), that 'the introduction of accelerated courses . . . may be increasingly attractive, given financial pressures on students . . .'.

It is true to say that students would be studying for a shorter time overall and should, in theory, incur fewer debts. However, four- term years prevent students from obtaining any kind of vacation work for a decent period of time. My elder brother studied at the University of Buckingham, which has operated this system for a number of years, and he is still paying for his university life three years later.

I am currently in my second year at the University of Teesside, and have been fortunate enough to work throughout the summer, which meant I could start this year with a clean slate. I am well aware that work is scarce, but for the few who can find a job to earn a few extra pounds, three-term years are ideal.

Yours sincerely,

MARIA COWLEY

Middlesbrough,

Cleveland

24 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in