Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inbox
Get our free View from Westminster email
YOUR article "Unhealthy facts behind healthy snacks" (Real Life, 3 September) was misleading. Much as I would like readers to abandon health bars and chomp away on Mars bars, as a scientist in the health industry, I must point out that the calorific/fat content quoted was not per bar for the chocolate but per 100g for the health bars.When comparing the Mars Bar (430cal) to the Frusli bar, the latter contains a mere 133cal and not 398 as quoted. Was this an example of excessive chocolate intake impairing reading ability?
Jo Evans
simon@bowfor.demon.co.uk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies